| |
|
Special Report: Sports
May 30, 2007
"The Monster Pig Photo's a Fake:" Reader's Comments
Exclusive Interview: With Kerry Dart, New York Farmer and Owner of World's Largest Hog
by Rhonda Roland Shearer
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Oh, and I almost forgot: That man is lying. I don't care if he's a Christian or not, Christians lie too. Once again, stop hiding behind Christianity. Christianity doesn't mean that anything you say is the truth and the whole truth. Christians are no better than any other religion and as a Christian myself, I'm telling y'all to get off your high horses! |
|
 |
| Comment by Emily | Jul 11, 2007 at 05:58 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| I'm sorry, but this is a fake. The proportions are different in each picture. That's it. Unless the boy is a shape shifter, this is a fake. And who brought up Christianity? Stop using Christianity as some sort of tool to prove that you are correct. We're discussing the existance (or non existance) of a monster pig. I don't know how some people could somehow put monster pigs and Christianity together. They have nothing to do with each other. |
|
 |
| Comment by Emily | Jul 11, 2007 at 05:47 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Yeah, but where in heck did they find that huge bunny? |
|
 |
| Comment by JackonFire | Jun 15, 2007 at 11:37 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| I still can't figure out who's the fattest hog! The real story here is that someone is one strip of bacon closer to a heart attack! LOL. What a fat and lazy family will do! God Bless you. |
|
 |
| Comment by doesnt matter | Jun 8, 2007 at 04:42 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| this is in response to Karins comment,
lost of those right wingers haven't herd about science, as 3 of the republican party nominee's for president stated they did not believe in evaluation at the republican debate two nights ago , your cant blame those one for believing this i real, |
|
 |
| Comment by Amalya | Jun 7, 2007 at 03:31 AM EST |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Our witty friend Amalya wrote: "this is in response to Karins comment, lost of those right wingers haven't herd about science, as 3 of the republican party nominee's for president stated they did not believe in evaluation at the republican debate two nights ago , your cant blame those one for believing this i real,"
Oh boy it is a shame that the Republican party nominees don't believe in 'evaluation' as you stated. That somewhat puzzles me...I know I 'evaluate' many things throughout the day. For some reason I am thinking you mean EVOLUTION. Yep, I bet that's it. There is a big difference between the two, maybe you should read up on it sometime. Oh and by the way--I am a right winger who knows all about science but doesn't believe in evaluation (oops I mean EVOLUTION) either. But hey, I can grasp the English language and form sentences. This is what is so frightening: people like you actually VOTING when you don't even know what you are talking about.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Comment by Tami | Jun 8, 2007 at 09:28 PM EST |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! WOW really?! You're bashing on someone for making a grammatical mistake??! I can spot several mistakes in your response, hell I already see I've also made some sort of mistake. Sure he put 'evaluation' vs evolution but he still got his point across, and if you think that what he said or her intelligence is lacking in the least when it comes to one little mistake in grammar, then you are obviously delusional. Sure, you "can grasp the English language and form sentences" but I'd be surprised to find out if you could do much else. I mean honestly, take a look at your message, the bulk of your argument is based off not the context she presented in her words but the accidental type. (And might I add most likely was an auto-correction mistake instead of her own as many Microsoft programs are based off) But not only did you make, what I may consider the must irrelevant argument that I have ever read, you also went onto say how frightful it is for people like her "actually VOTING when you don't even know what you are talking about." when in all fairness its rather clear to me now that it is you who knows not what you speak of! You brought up not one point that related to what she was talking about nor did you provide any evidence to prove that you have the slightest background of science; there is a huge difference from learning your 8th grade science in some right winged republic state that I am more than positive lays on the bible belt that likely had not spoke once even the word evolution. Now let me break this down, as I am sure that was all rather confusing. Here is the premise of your argument: Evolution is not spelled evaluation. then you say how its rather how you are somehow better than Amalya because you can use proper English. then from there said how she shouldn't be voting. Now honestly, do you think that because she put one wrong word that she is not able to vote even though we all understood what she meant? Can you not see you're failure to evaluate (IRONY) what you say? You're weak and pathetic in your simple minded ways, and clearly either OCD or obsessed to the communication arts, which in either case really doesn't have relevance to this forum, just like your message. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Comment by Nate | Oct 27, 2009 at 10:33 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| I still can't figure out which one's the fattest hog!
The real story here is that someone needs a diet of alot less bacon! |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Comment by doesnt matter | Jun 8, 2007 at 04:40 PM EST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|