http://www.Stinkyjournalism.orgTue, 09 Feb 2010 05:31:18 GMThttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/latest-journalism-news-updates.phpEthics of Courtroom TV : Should Proposition 8 Trials be Televised? ]]>624 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=624NY Times reports : Farming-out media content produces major risks ]]>621 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=621Graphic Images from Haiti : Would US Citizens Be Depicted The Same Way? ]]>632 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=632Washington Post Responds to Increasing Reader Complaints ]]>628 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=628Ethics Tweets from Science/Online Media Conference ]]>626 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=626Scientist says UK Sunday Times Fabricated Blonde Science Quotes ]]>627 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=627Vaccine Libel Suit Challenges Another Science Journalist ]]>623 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=6232010 Top Ten "Dubious Polling" Awards Woorst polls of the last year.  Every year, poll watchers are confronted with poll results and commentary that defy either logic or science, often raising questions about the very utility of polls. With this article, veteran pollsters, authors and political scientists, George F. Bishop and David W. Moore issue their Second Annual Top Ten “Dubious Polling” Awards. These awards are intended to mark for posterity some of the most risible and outrageous pronouncements by polling organizations during the previous year. >Go to Full Story]]>169 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgnewshttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/latest-journalism-news-updates-169.phpStar Tribune Byline Strike Begins ]]>629 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=629Gawker Shirks Ethics and Law? Offered Reward for Apple Tablet Info ]]>622 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=622Discussion Spreads on M.D. Reporters in Haiti ]]>625 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=625National Enquirer Ineligible for Pulitzer on a Technicality ]]>631 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=631More Conflict of Interest Issues at the New York Times ]]>619 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=619After Goldman Flight, Edward Wasserman Argues Upside of Paying Sources ]]>610 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=610Study Finds Mainstream Media, Not New Media, Write Most "New" Stories in Baltimore ]]>612 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=612Harry Reid "Negro" Quote Highlights Ethics of Interviewing Sources "On Background" ]]>614 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=614Senator Argues Bloggers are Modern Thomas Paines ]]>615 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=615"One-way ticket" error continued in Detroit Terror Suspect Stories ]]>611 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=611Dvorkin Calls for "Cyberombudsmen" ]]>618 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=618Devastating Earthquake Reveals Spotty, and Nearly Non-Existent, Media Presence in Haiti ]]>616 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=616Gupta in Haiti Raisies Ethical Questions of CNN's Coverage ]]>617 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=617Journalism Industry Leaders File Brief Supporting Students ]]>609 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=609Mechanization of Journalism: A Boon or Bust for Ethics? ]]>607 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=607Reuters Kills Story : What are the ethical issues? ]]>606 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=606New Breitbart Site, BigJournalism Mixes up "Bias" and "Skepticism" ]]>603 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=603Cold Weather Reveals Misunderstandings of Climate Science ]]>608 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=608ABC Features Jenny McCarthy in Autism Story Response : ]]>604 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=604Science Journalists Drawn to Potentially Misleading "Contrarian" Smoking Story ]]>602 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=602Series Critiques Canadian Business Reporting ]]>599 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=599Ethical Issues in Washington Post, Fiscal Times Partnership ]]>601 at http://www.stinkyjournalism.orgeditorialhttp://www.stinkyjournalism.org/editordetail.php?id=601